ENG-1330: zod schema for discourse relations#719
Conversation
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
1 similar comment
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request adds a new Relations feature to the GlobalSettings schema by introducing three Zod schemas (Triple, RelationCondition, DiscourseRelation) and extending GlobalSettingsSchema with a Relations field. The example file demonstrates the structure with two sample relation definitions containing metadata and conditional triples. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@apps/roam/src/components/settings/utils/zodSchema.ts`:
- Around line 139-154: The conversion currently drops relation metadata arrays:
STANDARD_ROLES (conceptConversion.ts) filters out triples and ifConditions and
discourseRelationSchemaToLocalConcept maps relation.triples to only the first
element via relation.triples.map((t) => t[0]), causing silent data loss when
producing LocalConceptDataInput for local_reference_content; update the
conversion to preserve the full arrays (include triples and ifConditions) by
adding them to the allowed output shape or extending LocalConceptDataInput to
accept a relations metadata field, remove or extend STANDARD_ROLES so it no
longer strips triples/ifConditions, and ensure
discourseRelationSchemaToLocalConcept copies relation.triples and
relation.ifConditions intact (instead of extracting only t[0]) so serialized
storage retains the full structures.
0370894 to
22c8d6b
Compare
mdroidian
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since these triples are just conditions I wonder if we could we reuse Conditions and/or ConditionSchema?
22c8d6b to
bc39440
Compare

https://www.loom.com/share/ea503e1ac69d4a8a8be222770058e3bf
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.