Skip to content

Conversation

@LHerskind
Copy link
Contributor

@LHerskind LHerskind commented Dec 15, 2025

Surprisingly little pain on the typescript side since we already had all that pain long ago, so the ts was already waiting until ready which seemed handled without hardcoded ideas around a lag

Copy link
Contributor Author

LHerskind commented Dec 15, 2025

@LHerskind LHerskind marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2025 19:38
Copy link
Contributor

@spalladino spalladino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks solid!

@LHerskind LHerskind force-pushed the lh/tmnt-462-lag-inbox-tree-consumption-by-one-checkpoint branch from f95ea90 to 80399a5 Compare January 2, 2026 13:29
@LHerskind LHerskind mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2026
@LHerskind LHerskind force-pushed the lh/tmnt-462-lag-inbox-tree-consumption-by-one-checkpoint branch from 80399a5 to c9cada9 Compare January 5, 2026 13:22
Surprisingly little pain on the typescript side since we already had all that pain long ago, so the ts was already waiting until ready which seemed handled without hardcoded ideas around a lag
@AztecBot AztecBot force-pushed the lh/tmnt-462-lag-inbox-tree-consumption-by-one-checkpoint branch from c9cada9 to ee146c8 Compare January 5, 2026 13:54
@AztecBot AztecBot enabled auto-merge January 5, 2026 13:54
@AztecBot AztecBot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 5, 2026
Merged via the queue into next with commit b5dfb91 Jan 5, 2026
18 checks passed
@AztecBot AztecBot deleted the lh/tmnt-462-lag-inbox-tree-consumption-by-one-checkpoint branch January 5, 2026 14:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants