Skip to content

Re-review documentation changes for tool definitions annotation#517

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoadd-tool-definitions-annotationfrom
copilot/sub-pr-515-again
Closed

Re-review documentation changes for tool definitions annotation#517
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoadd-tool-definitions-annotationfrom
copilot/sub-pr-515-again

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Feb 4, 2026

Description

Performed comprehensive re-review of the tool definitions annotation documentation as requested. No code changes made per explicit instruction.

Review findings:

  • ✅ API response path placeholder explanation properly addressed in commit 66fd5ba
  • ⚠️ YAML formatting issue (lines 254-259) remains unresolved - JSON string split across lines without proper YAML multiline syntax
  • ⚠️ Syntax highlighting range (line 243) remains incorrect - {7-11} should be {7-16} to highlight all annotations

Type of change

  • Documentation update

Related issues/PRs

Submitter checklist

Content and formatting

  • I have reviewed the content for technical accuracy
  • I have reviewed the content for spelling, grammar, and style

Reviewer checklist

Content

  • I have reviewed the content for technical accuracy
  • I have reviewed the content for spelling, grammar, and style

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 4, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs-website Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 4, 2026 0:56am

Request Review

@lujunsan
Copy link
Contributor

lujunsan commented Feb 4, 2026

Closing as unneeded, again...

@lujunsan lujunsan closed this Feb 4, 2026
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Document tool definitions annotation support Re-review documentation changes for tool definitions annotation Feb 4, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from lujunsan February 4, 2026 00:58
Copilot stopped work on behalf of lujunsan due to an error February 4, 2026 00:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants