Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanFlurry
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@railway-app
Copy link

railway-app bot commented Jan 12, 2026

🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-3833 environment in rivet-frontend

Service Status Web Updated (UTC)
frontend-inspector ❌ Build Failed (View Logs) Web Jan 12, 2026 at 9:51 pm
frontend-cloud ❌ Build Failed (View Logs) Web Jan 12, 2026 at 9:51 pm
website 🕒 Building (View Logs) Web Jan 12, 2026 at 9:49 pm

Copy link
Member Author

NathanFlurry commented Jan 12, 2026

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Pull Request Review: Default to Serverless API

Overview

This PR refactors the documentation to default to the serverless API pattern, which is a positive change for developer experience. The PR primarily updates documentation, examples, and adds new educational content about runtime modes and server setup.

✅ Strengths

  1. Improved Developer Experience: Defaulting to serverless is the right choice for most users - it's simpler and more aligned with modern deployment patterns.

  2. New Documentation Structure: The addition of runtime-modes.mdx and server-setup.mdx provides clear, comprehensive guidance on different deployment options.

  3. Consistent API Endpoint Pattern: Standardizing on /api/rivet/* throughout the documentation improves consistency.

  4. Better Component Reusability: The new React components (ConfigurationOptions, StepRunServer, StepSetupServer) promote DRY principles in documentation.

  5. Cleaner Example Code: The Hono example now clearly shows the Rivet handler before custom endpoints, which is better for comprehension.

📋 Observations

Documentation Quality

  • The new runtime modes documentation is well-structured with clear comparisons between serverless and runners
  • Good use of diagrams to explain architecture
  • Appropriate warnings about when to use runners vs serverless

Code Changes

  • The example changes are minimal and focused
  • No breaking changes to actual code, only documentation updates
  • pnpm-lock.yaml changes appear to be routine dependency resolution

🔍 Potential Issues

1. Typo in llms-full.txt (Line ~3300)

In the backend quickstart section:

default app;

Should be:

export default app;

2. Missing export Statement

Location: website/public/llms-full.txt:3307

const client = createClient();

This appears in the quickstart but it's unclear if this is intentional or if export was accidentally removed.

3. Incomplete Code Snippet

In llms-full.txt around line 3310, there's a snippet that seems truncated:

serve();

This doesn't show what's being imported or the full context.

4. Inconsistent Endpoint Patterns

While most docs use /api/rivet/*, some historical references might still exist. Consider doing a full audit:

grep -r "/rivet" website/src/content/docs/

5. React Example Simplification

The React quickstart was significantly simplified (removed form input, connection status), which is good, but ensure that removed concepts are covered elsewhere in the docs.

🛡️ Security Considerations

  • No security issues identified
  • The examples don't introduce any OWASP vulnerabilities
  • Proper use of typed clients throughout

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Documentation-only changes, no performance impact
  • The serverless-first approach is generally better for auto-scaling

🧪 Test Coverage

  • This PR is documentation-focused, so test coverage isn't directly applicable
  • Consider adding tests for the new React components (ConfigurationOptions, StepRunServer, StepSetupServer) if your documentation tooling supports it

📝 Code Style & Best Practices

Follows Repository Conventions ✅

  • Uses hard tabs (as per rustfmt.toml) where applicable
  • Documentation follows existing patterns
  • Component structure is consistent with the codebase

Areas for Improvement

  1. llms-full.txt maintenance: This file appears to be generated. Consider documenting the generation process to avoid manual sync issues.

  2. Component Documentation: The new React components could benefit from JSDoc comments explaining their purpose and props.

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority

  1. Fix the typo: default app;export default app; in llms-full.txt
  2. Verify all code snippets in llms-full.txt are complete and valid

Medium Priority

  1. Add JSDoc comments to the new React components
  2. Consider adding a migration guide for users currently using the old runner-first pattern
  3. Audit all docs for remaining /rivet references (without /api prefix)

Low Priority

  1. Consider adding a visual diff showing before/after for the quickstart flow
  2. Add troubleshooting section for common serverless deployment issues

✨ Summary

This is a well-executed documentation refactoring that improves the developer onboarding experience. The changes are focused, the new content is high quality, and the serverless-first approach is the right default.

The main issues are minor typos in the generated llms-full.txt file. Once those are addressed, this PR should be good to merge.

Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes required for the typos in llms-full.txt.


Review generated with attention to repository conventions per CLAUDE.md

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jan 12, 2026

More templates

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@3833

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@3833

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@3833

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@3833

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@3833

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@3833

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@3833

@rivetkit/virtual-websocket

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/virtual-websocket@3833

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@3833

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@3833

commit: d14b367

@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry changed the base branch from 01-09-chore_rivetkit_update_cloudflare_workers_and_nextjs_to_latest to graphite-base/3833 January 12, 2026 18:23
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-doc_default_to_serverless_pai branch from 701cbbc to e6deafe Compare January 12, 2026 18:23
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-3833 January 12, 2026 18:23 Destroyed
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry changed the base branch from graphite-base/3833 to 01-12-chore_rivetkit_preemptively_start_manager_engine_before_serverless_runner_has_started January 12, 2026 18:23
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-doc_default_to_serverless_pai branch from e6deafe to b9fc28b Compare January 12, 2026 19:12
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-chore_rivetkit_preemptively_start_manager_engine_before_serverless_runner_has_started branch from f786582 to 1ac9a83 Compare January 12, 2026 19:12
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-3833 January 12, 2026 19:12 Destroyed
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-doc_default_to_serverless_pai branch from b9fc28b to b829d2e Compare January 12, 2026 21:27
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-3833 January 12, 2026 21:27 Destroyed
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-doc_default_to_serverless_pai branch from b829d2e to 12b30bc Compare January 12, 2026 21:49
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-chore_rivetkit_preemptively_start_manager_engine_before_serverless_runner_has_started branch from 1ac9a83 to 6eb42fb Compare January 12, 2026 21:49
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-3833 January 12, 2026 21:49 Destroyed
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-doc_default_to_serverless_pai branch from 12b30bc to d14b367 Compare January 12, 2026 21:57
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-12-chore_rivetkit_preemptively_start_manager_engine_before_serverless_runner_has_started branch from 6eb42fb to 42c1475 Compare January 12, 2026 21:57
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-3833 January 12, 2026 21:57 Destroyed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 01-12-chore_rivetkit_preemptively_start_manager_engine_before_serverless_runner_has_started branch from 42c1475 to b83837e Compare January 12, 2026 21:59
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 01-12-doc_default_to_serverless_pai branch from d14b367 to eaef6b8 Compare January 12, 2026 22:00
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-3833 January 12, 2026 22:00 Destroyed
@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Merge activity

  • Jan 12, 10:01 PM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Jan 12, 10:02 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#3842) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Jan 12, 10:03 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #3842.

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Jan 12, 2026
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 01-12-doc_default_to_serverless_pai branch January 12, 2026 22:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants