Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Optimize hasSelection with short-circuit evaluation #294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+6 −1
Open

⚡ Bolt: Optimize hasSelection with short-circuit evaluation #294

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion Sources/Cacheout/ViewModels/CacheoutViewModel.swift
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -118,7 +118,12 @@ class CacheoutViewModel: ObservableObject {
}

var hasResults: Bool { !scanResults.isEmpty || !nodeModulesItems.isEmpty }
var hasSelection: Bool { !selectedResults.isEmpty || selectedNodeModulesSize > 0 }
var hasSelection: Bool {
// ⚡ Bolt Optimization: Use contains(where:) to short-circuit evaluation instead of
// allocating an intermediate filtered array (!selectedResults.isEmpty) or computing
// the total size of all selected items (selectedNodeModulesSize > 0). O(1) early exit vs O(N).
scanResults.contains(where: \.isSelected) || nodeModulesItems.contains(where: \.isSelected)
}

// MARK: - Node Modules computed properties

Expand Down
Loading