Skip to content

🚨 [security] Update all of rails: 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1 (minor) #84

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
depfu wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

🚨 [security] Update all of rails: 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1 (minor) #84

depfu wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Jul 13, 2022

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ minitest (5.15.0 → 5.16.2) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

5.16.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.16.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.16.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ rails (6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actioncable (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionmailbox (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

↗️ actionmailer (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionpack (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Pack

There is a possible XSS vulnerability in Rails / Action Pack. This vulnerability has been
assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-22577.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.0.2.4, 6.1.5.1, 6.0.4.8, 5.2.7.1

Impact

CSP headers were only sent along with responses that Rails considered as
"HTML" responses. This left API requests without CSP headers, which could
possibly expose users to XSS attacks.

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Set a CSP for your API responses manually.

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actiontext (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionview (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible XSS Vulnerability in Action View tag helpers

There is a possible XSS vulnerability in Action View tag helpers. Passing
untrusted input as hash keys can lead to a possible XSS vulnerability. This
vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-27777.

Versions Affected: ALL
Not affected: NONE
Fixed Versions: 7.0.2.4, 6.1.5.1, 6.0.4.8, 5.2.7.1

Impact

If untrusted data is passed as the hash key for tag attributes, there is a
possibility that the untrusted data may not be properly escaped which can
lead to an XSS vulnerability.

Impacted code will look something like this:

check_box_tag('thename', 'thevalue', false, aria: { malicious_input => 'thevalueofaria' })

Where the "malicious_input" variable contains untrusted data.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Escape the untrusted data before using it as a key for tag helper methods.

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activejob (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activemodel (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activerecord (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible RCE escalation bug with Serialized Columns in Active Record

There is a possible escalation to RCE when using YAML serialized columns in
Active Record. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier
CVE-2022-32224.

Versions Affected: All.
Not affected: None
Fixed Versions: 7.0.3.1, 6.1.6.1, 6.0.5.1, 5.2.8.1

Impact

When serialized columns that use YAML (the default) are deserialized, Rails
uses YAML.unsafe_load to convert the YAML data in to Ruby objects. If an
attacker can manipulate data in the database (via means like SQL injection),
then it may be possible for the attacker to escalate to an RCE.

Impacted Active Record models will look something like this:

class User < ApplicationRecord
  serialize :options       # Vulnerable: Uses YAML for serialization
  serialize :values, Array # Vulnerable: Uses YAML for serialization
  serialize :values, JSON  # Not vulnerable
end

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

The released versions change the default YAML deserializer to use
YAML.safe_load, which prevents deserialization of possibly dangerous
objects. This may introduce backwards compatibility issues with existing
data.

In order to cope with that situation, the released version also contains two
new Active Record configuration options. The configuration options are as
follows:

  • config.active_storage.use_yaml_unsafe_load

When set to true, this configuration option tells Rails to use the old
"unsafe" YAML loading strategy, maintaining the existing behavior but leaving
the possible escalation vulnerability in place. Setting this option to true
is not recommended, but can aid in upgrading.

  • config.active_record.yaml_column_permitted_classes

The "safe YAML" loading method does not allow all classes to be deserialized
by default. This option allows you to specify classes deemed "safe" in your
application. For example, if your application uses Symbol and Time in
serialized data, you can add Symbol and Time to the allowed list as follows:

config.active_record.yaml_column_permitted_classes = [Symbol, Date, Time]

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue, but other coders (such as
JSON) are not impacted.

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activestorage (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activesupport (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ concurrent-ruby (indirect, 1.1.9 → 1.1.10) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.1.10

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ i18n (indirect, 1.10.0 → 1.11.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.11.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ loofah (indirect, 2.14.0 → 2.18.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.18.0

More info than we can show here.

2.17.0

More info than we can show here.

2.16.0

More info than we can show here.

2.15.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ nokogiri (indirect, 1.13.3 → 1.13.7) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type in Nokogiri

Summary

Nokogiri < v1.13.6 does not type-check all inputs into the XML and HTML4 SAX parsers.
For CRuby users, this may allow specially crafted untrusted inputs to cause illegal
memory access errors (segfault) or reads from unrelated memory.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as High 8.2 (CVSS3.1).

Mitigation

CRuby users should upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.13.6.

JRuby users are not affected.

Workarounds

To avoid this vulnerability in affected applications, ensure the untrusted input is a
String by calling #to_s or equivalent.

🚨 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in libxml2 affects Nokogiri

Summary

Nokogiri v1.13.5 upgrades the packaged version of its dependency libxml2 from
v2.9.13 to v2.9.14.

libxml2 v2.9.14 addresses CVE-2022-29824.
This version also includes several security-related bug fixes for which CVEs were not created,
including a potential double-free, potential memory leaks, and integer-overflow.

Please note that this advisory only applies to the CRuby implementation of Nokogiri
< 1.13.5, and only if the packaged libraries are being used. If you've overridden
defaults at installation time to use system libraries instead of packaged libraries,
you should instead pay attention to your distro's libxml2 and libxslt release announcements.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.13.5.

Users who are unable to upgrade Nokogiri may also choose a more complicated mitigation:
compile and link Nokogiri against external libraries libxml2 >= 2.9.14 which will also
address these same issues.

Impact

libxml2 CVE-2022-29824

  • CVSS3 score:
  • Type: Denial of service, information disclosure
  • Description: In libxml2 before 2.9.14, several buffer handling functions in buf.c (xmlBuf*) and tree.c (xmlBuffer*) don't check for integer overflows. This can result in out-of-bounds memory writes. Exploitation requires a victim to open a crafted, multi-gigabyte XML file. Other software using libxml2's buffer functions, for example libxslt through 1.1.35, is affected as well.
  • Fixed: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/2554a24

All versions of libml2 prior to v2.9.14 are affected.

Applications parsing or serializing multi-gigabyte documents (in excess of INT_MAX bytes) may be vulnerable to an integer overflow bug in buffer handling that could lead to exposure of confidential data, modification of unrelated data, or a segmentation fault resulting in a denial-of-service.

References

🚨 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in Nokogiri

Summary

Nokogiri < v1.13.4 contains an inefficient regular expression that is
susceptible to excessive backtracking when attempting to detect encoding
in HTML documents.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.13.4.

🚨 Denial of Service (DoS) in Nokogiri on JRuby

Summary

Nokogiri v1.13.4 updates the vendored org.cyberneko.html library to
1.9.22.noko2 which addresses CVE-2022-24839.
That CVE is rated 7.5 (High Severity).

See GHSA-9849-p7jc-9rmv
for more information.

Please note that this advisory only applies to the JRuby implementation of Nokogiri < 1.13.4.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.13.4.

Impact

CVE-2022-24839 in nekohtml

  • Severity: High 7.5
  • Type: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
  • Description: The fork of org.cyberneko.html used by Nokogiri (Rubygem) raises a
    java.lang.OutOfMemoryError exception when parsing ill-formed HTML markup.
  • See also: GHSA-9849-p7jc-9rmv

🚨 Out-of-bounds Write in zlib affects Nokogiri

Summary

Nokogiri v1.13.4 updates the vendored zlib from 1.2.11
to 1.2.12, which addresses CVE-2018-25032.
That CVE is scored as CVSS 7.4 "High" on the NVD record as of 2022-04-05.

Please note that this advisory only applies to the CRuby implementation of
Nokogiri < 1.13.4, and only if the packaged version of zlib is being used.
Please see this document
for a complete description of which platform gems vendor zlib. If you've
overridden defaults at installation time to use system libraries instead of
packaged libraries, you should instead pay attention to your distro's zlib
release announcements.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= v1.13.4.

Impact

CVE-2018-25032 in zlib

  • Severity: High
  • Type: CWE-787
    Out of bounds write
  • Description: zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption when
    deflating (i.e., when compressing) if the input has many distant matches.

🚨 XML Injection in Xerces Java affects Nokogiri

Summary

Nokogiri v1.13.4 updates the vendored xerces:xercesImpl from 2.12.0 to
2.12.2, which addresses CVE-2022-23437.
That CVE is scored as CVSS 6.5 "Medium" on the NVD record.

Please note that this advisory only applies to the JRuby implementation
of Nokogiri < 1.13.4.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= v1.13.4.

Impact

CVE-2022-23437 in xerces-J

  • Severity: Medium
  • Type: CWE-91 XML Injection (aka Blind XPath Injection)
  • Description: There's a vulnerability within the Apache Xerces Java
    (XercesJ) XML parser when handling specially crafted XML document payloads.
    This causes, the XercesJ XML parser to wait in an infinite loop, which may
    sometimes consume system resources for prolonged duration. This vulnerability
    is present within XercesJ version 2.12.1 and the previous versions.
  • See also: GHSA-h65f-jvqw-m9fj
Release Notes

1.13.6

More info than we can show here.

1.13.5

More info than we can show here.

1.13.4

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ rack (indirect, 2.2.3 → 2.2.4) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing

There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing
component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier
CVE-2022-30122.

Versions Affected: >= 1.2
Not affected: < 1.2
Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1

Impact

Carefully crafted multipart POST requests can cause Rack's multipart parser to
take much longer than expected, leading to a possible denial of service
vulnerability.

Impacted code will use Rack's multipart parser to parse multipart posts. This
includes directly using the multipart parser like this:

params = Rack::Multipart.parse_multipart(env)

But it also includes reading POST data from a Rack request object like this:

p request.POST # read POST data
p request.params # reads both query params and POST data

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

🚨 Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack

There is a possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in the Lint
and CommonLogger components of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the
CVE identifier CVE-2022-30123.

Versions Affected: All.
Not affected: None
Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1

Impact

Carefully crafted requests can cause shell escape sequences to be written to
the terminal via Rack's Lint middleware and CommonLogger middleware. These
escape sequences can be leveraged to possibly execute commands in the victim's
terminal.

Impacted applications will have either of these middleware installed, and
vulnerable apps may have something like this:

use Rack::Lint

Or

use Rack::CommonLogger

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

Remove these middleware from your application

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ rack-test (indirect, 1.1.0 → 2.0.2) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.0.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

2.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

2.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ rails-html-sanitizer (indirect, 1.4.2 → 1.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible XSS vulnerability with certain configurations of Rails::Html::Sanitizer

There is a possible XSS vulnerability with certain configurations of Rails::Html::Sanitizer.
This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-32209.

Versions Affected: ALL
Not affected: NONE
Fixed Versions: v1.4.3

Impact

A possible XSS vulnerability with certain configurations of
Rails::Html::Sanitizer may allow an attacker to inject content if the
application developer has overridden the sanitizer's allowed tags to allow
both select and style elements.

Code is only impacted if allowed tags are being overridden. This may be done via application configuration:

# In config/application.rb
config.action_view.sanitized_allowed_tags = ["select", "style"]

see https://guides.rubyonrails.org/configuring.html#configuring-action-view

Or it may be done with a :tags option to the Action View helper sanitize:

<%= sanitize @comment.body, tags: ["select", "style"] %>

see https://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/SanitizeHelper.html#method-i-sanitize

Or it may be done with Rails::Html::SafeListSanitizer directly:

# class-level option
Rails::Html::SafeListSanitizer.allowed_tags = ["select", "style"]

or

# instance-level option
Rails::Html::SafeListSanitizer.new.sanitize(@article.body, tags: ["select", "style"])

All users overriding the allowed tags by any of the above mechanisms to include both "select" and "style" should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Remove either select or style from the overridden allowed tags.

Credits

This vulnerability was responsibly reported by windshock.

Release Notes

1.4.3

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ railties (indirect, 6.1.5 → 6.1.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.5.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ sprockets (indirect, 4.0.3 → 4.1.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

4.1.1

More info than we can show here.

4.1.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ zeitwerk (indirect, 2.5.4 → 2.6.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.6.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Jul 13, 2022
@depfu depfu bot mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2022
Closed
@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Sep 10, 2022

Closed in favor of #86.

@depfu depfu bot closed this Sep 10, 2022
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/group/rails-6.1.6.1 branch September 10, 2022 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

depfu

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant