[test] Add TEST RFC to verify enhanced discussion workflow

rfcs/9999-TEST-enhanced-discussion-workflow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+# RFC: TEST - Enhanced Discussion Workflow Integration
+
+- Start Date: 2025-01-06
+- Target Major Version: (1.x)
+- Reference Issues: N/A - Testing enhanced workflow
+- Implementation PR: (leave this empty)
+
+## Summary
+
+This is a **TEST RFC** to verify the enhanced discussion integration workflow. It should automatically create a rich discussion with full proposal content and demonstrate the sync capabilities when the RFC is updated.
+
+**🔄 UPDATED**: This content has been modified to test the automatic discussion sync feature!
+
+**✅ SYNTAX FIX APPLIED**: Testing the workflow fix that prevents JavaScript syntax errors from special characters.
+
+## Basic example
+
+```javascript
+// Test content to verify workflow functionality
+console.log("Testing enhanced RFC discussion workflow");
+
+function testWorkflow() {
+  return {
+    autoDiscussionCreation: true,
+    fullContentEmbedding: true,
+    autoSync: true,
+    forkCompatibility: true
+  };
+}
+```
+
+## Motivation
+
+We need to test that:
+
+1. **Rich Discussion Creation**: Discussions include full RFC content, author info, and useful links
+2. **Automatic Sync**: When RFCs are updated via PR commits, discussion content updates automatically  
+3. **Better Formatting**: Discussions use proper markdown with sections and metadata
+4. **Fork Compatibility**: Works with `pull_request_target` for fork contributions
+
+This test will validate all these features work as expected.
+
+### ✅ Testing Update Sync
+
+This section was added to verify that when we push changes to the RFC file, the GitHub discussion automatically updates to reflect the new content. The sync workflow should detect this change and update the discussion body with the modified RFC content.
+
+**🔧 Round 3 Testing**: This is the third test commit after applying the JavaScript syntax error fix. The workflow should now handle special characters like brackets `[test]`, apostrophes `GitHub's`, and any other content safely.
+
+## Detailed design
+
+### Enhanced Discussion Features
+
+The workflow improvements include:
+
+- **Author Attribution**: Displays RFC author prominently
+- **Status Indicators**: Shows current RFC status with emoji indicators
+- **Quick Links Section**: Provides easy access to PR, changes, and rendered proposal
+- **Embedded Content**: Full RFC content is embedded and stays current
+- **Metadata Display**: Shows last updated timestamp and commit information
+- **Sync Capabilities**: Automatically updates when PR content changes
+
+### Technical Implementation Details
+
+1. **Creation Workflow**: Enhanced `rfc-discussion.yml` extracts RFC content from PR
+2. **Sync Workflow**: New `sync-rfc-discussion.yml` monitors for PR updates  
+3. **GraphQL Integration**: Uses GitHub's discussion API for content updates
+4. **Content Extraction**: Fetches RFC content from PR branch using GitHub API
+5. **Template Generation**: Builds discussion body with structured sections
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+- More complex workflow configuration
+- Additional GitHub API calls for content fetching and updates
+- Potential for larger discussion bodies with embedded content
+
+## Alternatives
+
+- Keep simple discussion format with minimal content
+- Use manual discussion updates instead of automation
+- Rely on PR comments rather than dedicated discussions
+
+## Adoption strategy
+
+This is a workflow enhancement that improves the RFC process without affecting existing RFCs or requiring changes from RFC authors. The enhanced discussions provide better visibility and engagement.
+
+## Unresolved questions
+
+- Should we add diff information in sync updates?
+- How should we handle very large RFC files?
+- Should we include additional metadata like file size or word count?
+
+---
+
+**Note**: This is a TEST RFC - it will be deleted after verifying the workflow functions correctly.