[test] Add TEST RFC to verify enhanced discussion workflow #39
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Works on initial PR:
|
This RFC will test the new discussion creation and sync capabilities
Added update indicators and new section to test automatic discussion content synchronization
Added content with special characters to verify the JavaScript syntax error fix works correctly. Should handle brackets, apostrophes, and other special chars safely.
christian-byrne
force-pushed
the
test-enhanced-rfc-workflow
branch
from
e537da2 to
7b0edef
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
After #41, when updates are made to the RFC on open PR, the discussion post is also automatically updated:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This RFC will test the new discussion creation and sync capabilities
Summary
Links
Full Rendered Proposal
Discussion Thread
Important: Do NOT comment on this PR. Please use the discussion thread linked above to provide feedback, as it provides branched discussions that are easier to follow. This also makes the edit history of the PR clearer.