ENH: Update CastXML to fix MSVC Stack size testing issue

[hjmjohnson]

• test: Label tests requiring a large stack size CastXML#295

[hjmjohnson]

@bradking I was unable to replicate this error on my local Windows VS 2022 build of this same codebase.

I am not familiar with how this system works, but it seems like the CI is giving a warning ab the use of "-c" flag that is not used in windows builds that is corrupting the expected output.

This is a failing test, even though I think that the code would working.

I'd love some advice in how to get this failing test to pass on the github CI.

Thanks,
Hans

  51/5242 Test   #51: cmd.fbracket-depth ...........................................***Failed    0.26 sec
CMake Error at D:/a/CastXMLSuperbuild/CastXMLSuperbuild/build/castxml-prefix/src/castxml/test/run.cmake:117 (message):
  result does not match that expected.

  stderr does not match that expected.

  Command was:

   command> "D:/a/CastXMLSuperbuild/CastXMLSuperbuild/build/castxml-prefix/src/castxml-build/bin/castxml.exe" "-fbracket-depth=300" "-std=c11" "-c" "D:/a/CastXMLSuperbuild/CastXMLSuperbuild/build/castxml-prefix/src/castxml/test/input/fbracket-depth.c"

  Expected result to match:

   expect-result> 1

  Expected stderr to match:

   expect-stderr> [^
   expect-stderr> ]*/test/input/fbracket-depth.c:[0-9:]+: fatal error: bracket nesting level exceeded maximum of 300

  Actual result:

   actual-result> Access violation

  Actual stdout:

   actual-stdout> 

  Actual stderr:

   actual-stderr> warning: argument unused during compilation: '-c' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]

[bradking]

That test was added by CastXML/CastXML#219, and the failure looks much like the problem that change was meant to fix. Please check the -stack:... argument with which the superbuild is linking castxml.exe.

[bradking]

Or, I wonder if GitHub Actions is somehow limiting the stack size of the process.

[hjmjohnson]

@thewtex @bradking This PR will need to be modified after the CastXML PR

• test: Label tests requiring a large stack size CastXML#295
  is reviewed.

[hjmjohnson]

@thewtex I think this is ready for review and merging.

[dzenanz]

LGTM. Deferring merging to Matt/Brad.