Skip to content

[action] [PR:24770] Fix the Broadcom supported cmds list in techsupport#1213

Open
mssonicbld wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/24770
Open

[action] [PR:24770] Fix the Broadcom supported cmds list in techsupport#1213
mssonicbld wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/24770

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Due to the changes in PR#4542, the show_techsupport test needs to check Broadcom commands based on the chip module.

The fix separates non-TH5 and TH5 commands into different lists (broadcom_cmd_bcmcmd_xgs_soc and broadcom_cmd_bcmcmd_xgs_th5) and combines with the common commands list (broadcom_cmd_bcmcmd_xgs) before checking.

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • 202511
  • 202512
  • 202605

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

To address show_techsupport test failure after PR#4542 is merged.

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Run show_techsupport test on the DUTs with Broadcom non-TH5 and TH5 chipsets, and verify no failed cases.

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Signed-off-by: Sonic Build Admin sonicbld@microsoft.com

Due to the changes in [PR#4542](sonic-net/sonic-utilities#4542), the show_techsupport test needs to check Broadcom commands based on the chip module.

The fix separates non-TH5 and TH5 commands into different lists (broadcom_cmd_bcmcmd_xgs_soc and broadcom_cmd_bcmcmd_xgs_th5) and combines with the common commands list (broadcom_cmd_bcmcmd_xgs) before checking.

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
    - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [ ] 202505
- [x] 202511
- [ ] 202512
- [ ] 202605

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
To address show_techsupport test failure after [PR#4542](sonic-net/sonic-utilities#4542) is merged.

#### How did you do it?

#### How did you verify/test it?
Run show_techsupport test on the DUTs with Broadcom non-TH5 and TH5 chipsets, and verify no failed cases.

#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->

Signed-off-by: Sonic Build Admin <sonicbld@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#24770

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

This cherry pick PR has been opened for more than 3 days. The mssonicbld will attempt to retry.

---Powered by SONiC BuildBot

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azpw retry

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@r12f The cherry pick PR didn't pass PR checker after retry. Left a comment in original PR sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#24770 to notify author.

---Powered by SONiC BuildBot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant