Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

}
helper.SuccessWithData(c, res)
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There appear to be no significant coding changes required with respect to file processing using wget, but there might be some potential issues around handling JSON and caching in the context of this use case. Also, considering how we are currently managing files in-memory through string, it would generally make more sense to move away from strings for storing state (such as a map or array) so that we don't run out of memory when working on big data sets.

In terms of general improvements like modularization/standardizing naming conventions etc., I'd say the current implementation is good, though there are some places where it could improve readability and maintainability. This includes:

  • Using type annotations instead of Go's default string-type if possible, which helps with debugging by allowing clear visibility into parameter types,
  • Refactoring method calls across packages (if relevant),
  • Creating utility functions rather than inline small pieces of logic,

Please refer to comments provided inside each function body for specific details.

Remember all these comments can still grow over time based on usage patterns and enhancements made during maintenance processes; It's also worth mentioning we should always have version control checked-in source code!

getWgetProcess();
});
</script>

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided answer is not in English, it seems to be in Chinese. Please note the following:

  1. The computed() function should return a property with reactive data rather than accessing another component directly.

    const mobile = computed(() => ({ ...mobile }));
    
  2. Use the const or let instead of the keyword "global" if you're using this in a larger code base.

  3. Remove unnecessary semicolons and add a space for better readability like:

loading.value = true;
if (req.search != '') {

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the approved label Mar 4, 2025
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot merged commit 6092e76 into dev-v2 Mar 4, 2025
6 checks passed
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot deleted the pr@dev-v2@file branch March 4, 2025 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants