Skip to content

Conversation

@fatboypunk
Copy link
Contributor

@fatboypunk fatboypunk commented Jan 7, 2026

Because:
This way it's easier to find where the request went wrong, when having multiple requests in the same test.

  • Review required
  • Includes 1+ tests
  • Fully tested locally
Before After
Screenshot 2026-01-07 at 14 22 49 image

Because:
This way it's easier to find where the request went wrong, when having
multiple requests in the same test.
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build bb5c2f7714179b1f543412707d20a2c3b5a015ef-PR-22

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 85.505%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build e144cc9c2eb463bcb3c4d692ed396fc91eb37b21: 0.03%
Covered Lines: 466
Relevant Lines: 545

💛 - Coveralls

@fatboypunk fatboypunk merged commit 9dd5f7c into main Jan 7, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants