-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
NourElhouda's Pull Request #619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @nourelhouda64, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a minor textual refinement to the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a minor grammatical and stylistic update to the README.md file. While the grammatical change is an improvement, the switch to typographic quotes for "Regenerate Handbook" creates an inconsistency with other parts of the document where straight quotes are still in use. I have provided a suggestion to revert the quote style to maintain consistency. For future contributions, please consider using a more descriptive pull request title and filling out the description to provide better context for reviewers.
| ## Automated Handbook Generation | ||
|
|
||
| The handbook can be regenerated automatically using the "Regenerate Handbook" GitHub Actions workflow. This workflow can be triggered in two ways: | ||
| The handbook can be automatically regenerated using the “Regenerate Handbook” GitHub Actions workflow, which can be triggered in two ways: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While using typographic (curly) quotes (“... ”) can improve the look of the text, this change introduces an inconsistency. The same workflow name on line 26, "Regenerate Handbook", still uses standard straight quotes. To maintain consistency throughout the document, it's best to stick to one style. I recommend reverting to straight quotes here. The grammatical improvement to the sentence is good, however.
| The handbook can be automatically regenerated using the “Regenerate Handbook” GitHub Actions workflow, which can be triggered in two ways: | |
| The handbook can be automatically regenerated using the "Regenerate Handbook" GitHub Actions workflow, which can be triggered in two ways: |
No description provided.