Skip to content

Conversation

@nourelhouda64
Copy link

No description provided.

@nourelhouda64 nourelhouda64 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2026 04:31
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @nourelhouda64, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a minor textual refinement to the README.md file. The change focuses on improving the readability and consistency of the language used to describe the automated handbook generation process, specifically by rephrasing a sentence and updating quotation marks.

Highlights

  • README.md Readability: Improved the phrasing and punctuation in the 'Automated Handbook Generation' section of the README.md file for enhanced clarity.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a minor grammatical and stylistic update to the README.md file. While the grammatical change is an improvement, the switch to typographic quotes for "Regenerate Handbook" creates an inconsistency with other parts of the document where straight quotes are still in use. I have provided a suggestion to revert the quote style to maintain consistency. For future contributions, please consider using a more descriptive pull request title and filling out the description to provide better context for reviewers.

## Automated Handbook Generation

The handbook can be regenerated automatically using the "Regenerate Handbook" GitHub Actions workflow. This workflow can be triggered in two ways:
The handbook can be automatically regenerated using the Regenerate Handbook GitHub Actions workflow, which can be triggered in two ways:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While using typographic (curly) quotes (“... ”) can improve the look of the text, this change introduces an inconsistency. The same workflow name on line 26, "Regenerate Handbook", still uses standard straight quotes. To maintain consistency throughout the document, it's best to stick to one style. I recommend reverting to straight quotes here. The grammatical improvement to the sentence is good, however.

Suggested change
The handbook can be automatically regenerated using the Regenerate Handbook GitHub Actions workflow, which can be triggered in two ways:
The handbook can be automatically regenerated using the "Regenerate Handbook" GitHub Actions workflow, which can be triggered in two ways:

@nourelhouda64 nourelhouda64 closed this by deleting the head repository Jan 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants