Skip to content

20260506-check_domain_name-local_IsValidFQDN#10419

Merged
SparkiDev merged 2 commits intowolfSSL:masterfrom
douzzer:20260506-check_domain_name-local_IsValidFQDN
May 7, 2026
Merged

20260506-check_domain_name-local_IsValidFQDN#10419
SparkiDev merged 2 commits intowolfSSL:masterfrom
douzzer:20260506-check_domain_name-local_IsValidFQDN

Conversation

@douzzer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@douzzer douzzer commented May 6, 2026

src/ssl.c: in wolfSSL_check_domain_name(), call wolfssl_local_IsValidFQDN() to validate the argument, with allowance for "localhost".

scripts/crl-revoked.test: improve "Workaround to not pollute the certs folder" (don't copy whole source tree, and don't copy file contents).

…FQDN() to validate the argument, with allowance for "localhost".

scripts/crl-revoked.test: improve "Workaround to not pollute the certs folder" (don't copy whole source tree, and don't copy file contents).
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wolfSSL-Fenrir-bot wolfSSL-Fenrir-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fenrir Automated Review — PR #10419

Scan targets checked: wolfssl-bugs, wolfssl-src

No new issues found in the changed files. ✅

wolfcrypt/src/asn.c, wolfssl/wolfcrypt/asn.h, src/ssl.c, wolfssl/ssl.h: move wolfssl_local_IsValidFQDN() from ASN.1 layer (where it has no users and is gated out in lean PSK builds) to TLS layer (where its users are);

scripts/crl-revoked.test: use `cp --symbolic-link` opportunistically but fall back to `cp -p`.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 7, 2026

MemBrowse Memory Report

gcc-arm-cortex-m4

  • FLASH: .text +64 B (+0.0%, 197,503 B / 262,144 B, total: 75% used)

gcc-arm-cortex-m4-tls12

@SparkiDev SparkiDev removed the request for review from wolfSSL-Bot May 7, 2026 06:58
@SparkiDev SparkiDev self-assigned this May 7, 2026
@SparkiDev SparkiDev merged commit 94e3caa into wolfSSL:master May 7, 2026
446 of 448 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants