-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
Bulk take in ListView naive_rebuild #6492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
palaska
wants to merge
2
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
bp/listview-rebuild
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ | ||
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
| // SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright the Vortex contributors | ||
|
|
||
| //! Benchmarks for ListView rebuild with primitive and VarBinView elements. | ||
|
|
||
| #![allow(clippy::unwrap_used)] | ||
| #![allow(clippy::cast_possible_truncation)] | ||
|
|
||
| use divan::Bencher; | ||
| use vortex_array::IntoArray; | ||
| use vortex_array::arrays::ListViewArray; | ||
| use vortex_array::arrays::ListViewRebuildMode; | ||
| use vortex_array::arrays::PrimitiveArray; | ||
| use vortex_array::arrays::VarBinViewArray; | ||
| use vortex_array::validity::Validity; | ||
| use vortex_buffer::Buffer; | ||
|
|
||
| fn main() { | ||
| divan::main(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const NUM_LISTS: &[usize] = &[100, 1_000, 10_000]; | ||
|
|
||
| fn make_primitive_listview(num_lists: usize) -> ListViewArray { | ||
| let element_count = num_lists * 4; | ||
| let elements = PrimitiveArray::from_iter(0..element_count as i32).into_array(); | ||
| let offsets: Buffer<u32> = (0..num_lists).map(|i| (i * 2) as u32).collect(); | ||
| let sizes: Buffer<u32> = std::iter::repeat_n(4u32, num_lists).collect(); | ||
| ListViewArray::new( | ||
| elements, | ||
| offsets.into_array(), | ||
| sizes.into_array(), | ||
| Validity::NonNullable, | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn make_varbinview_listview(num_lists: usize) -> ListViewArray { | ||
| let element_count = num_lists * 4; | ||
| let strings: Vec<String> = (0..element_count) | ||
| .map(|i| { | ||
| if i % 3 == 0 { | ||
| format!("long-string-value-{i:06}") | ||
| } else { | ||
| format!("s{i}") | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| .collect(); | ||
| let elements = VarBinViewArray::from_iter_str(strings.iter().map(|s| s.as_str())).into_array(); | ||
| let offsets: Buffer<u32> = (0..num_lists).map(|i| (i * 2) as u32).collect(); | ||
| let sizes: Buffer<u32> = std::iter::repeat_n(4u32, num_lists).collect(); | ||
| ListViewArray::new( | ||
| elements, | ||
| offsets.into_array(), | ||
| sizes.into_array(), | ||
| Validity::NonNullable, | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[divan::bench(args = NUM_LISTS)] | ||
| fn rebuild_primitive(bencher: Bencher, num_lists: usize) { | ||
| let listview = make_primitive_listview(num_lists); | ||
| bencher | ||
| .with_inputs(|| &listview) | ||
| .bench_refs(|lv| lv.rebuild(ListViewRebuildMode::MakeZeroCopyToList).unwrap()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[divan::bench(args = NUM_LISTS)] | ||
| fn rebuild_varbinview(bencher: Bencher, num_lists: usize) { | ||
| let listview = make_varbinview_listview(num_lists); | ||
| bencher | ||
| .with_inputs(|| &listview) | ||
| .bench_refs(|lv| lv.rebuild(ListViewRebuildMode::MakeZeroCopyToList).unwrap()); | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the case that we read
ListViewArrayfrom disk and we want to export to datafusion (basically if we want to export as aListArrayto Arrow), I believe that not executing here might be more beneficial.If we want to push down a filter/take into a
ListViewfrom Datafusion/arrow, then we definitely do not want to execute here since it would be better to combine the filter/take with this take here.I also think that this is the more common (perhaps only?) path that this
naive_rebuildexists in.cc @joseph-isaacs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, not sure what the caller expects to get here. I think it makes sense to keep it lazy and leave canonicalization up to the caller, wdyt @joseph-isaacs ?