CodSpeed

[oech3]

No description provided.

[oech3]

Accidentaly opened.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 14.64%

_{Comparing oech3:libstdbuf-test (1a3d3be) with main (f388214)}

Summary

⚡ 10 improved benchmarks
❌ 26 regressed benchmarks
✅ 106 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 180 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	cksum_sha384	1.1 s	1.1 s	-3.02%
❌	Simulation	cksum_sha512	1.1 s	1.1 s	-3.02%
❌	Simulation	sort_numeric_utf8_locale	20.1 ms	20.7 ms	-3.16%
❌	Simulation	split_lines	5.7 ms	6.7 ms	-14.56%
❌	Simulation	split_numeric_suffix	5.9 ms	6.9 ms	-14.2%
❌	Simulation	dd_copy_with_skip	2.2 ms	2.3 ms	-4.36%
❌	Simulation	dd_copy_with_seek	2.2 ms	2.3 ms	-4.71%
❌	Simulation	dd_copy_8k_blocks	1 ms	1.1 ms	-3.63%
❌	Simulation	dd_copy_default	13.7 ms	14.4 ms	-4.56%
❌	Simulation	dd_copy_4k_blocks	1.3 ms	1.4 ms	-4.7%
❌	Simulation	cp_large_file[16]	370.9 µs	394.7 µs	-6.04%
⚡	Simulation	shuf_lines[100000]	31.6 ms	28.3 ms	+11.65%
❌	Simulation	shuf_repeat_sampling[50000]	5.2 ms	6.1 ms	-14.64%
❌	Simulation	shuf_input_range[1000000]	163.5 ms	191.3 ms	-14.55%
❌	Simulation	tsort_tree_dag[(10, 3)]	34.4 ms	36 ms	-4.47%
❌	Simulation	tsort_wide_dag[100000]	130.8 ms	135.6 ms	-3.56%
❌	Simulation	tsort_complex_dag[50000]	85.7 ms	88.9 ms	-3.59%
❌	Simulation	tsort_linear_chain[1000000]	1.6 s	1.6 s	-3.3%
⚡	Simulation	unexpand_many_lines[100000]	282.6 ms	263.2 ms	+7.35%
⚡	Simulation	unexpand_large_file[10]	592.4 ms	551.8 ms	+7.35%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

1. 180 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)