Skip to content

Conversation

@not-matthias
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, just wanted to let you know that we replaced the analysis for memory profiling with memory.

This will make it easier to use a matrix which allows passing the same value to cargo codspeed and the CodSpeedHQ/action, removing the need for an extra if statement. See the changes in this PR for the simplified/fixed version.

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 21, 2026

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 3.18%

Comparing AvalancheHQ:cod-2066-analysis-mode-missing-for-codspeed-rust-causing-workflow (401eb89) with main (f388214)

Summary

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 141 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 180 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation cp_large_file[16] 370.9 µs 383.1 µs -3.18%

Footnotes

  1. 180 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit aa218a3 into uutils:main Jan 22, 2026
130 of 131 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants