-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 952
chore(releases): automatically update the lockfile in changeset PRs #2732
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is a step which we currently need to do manually and it's rather painful. The lockfile update is necessary due to cross references in our packages. Added it as a separate job instead of a step to start from fresh workspace, as the state that the `changeset` step leaves the workdir is not explicitly clear to the reader.
|
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions job "Update lockfile on release PR" was added to .github/workflows/release.yml. It runs after the Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (3)📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T16:27:48.109ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T16:27:48.109ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2024-09-23T12:51:42.019ZApplied to files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| node-version: 20.19.0 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Install and update lockfile | ||
| run: pnpm install |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should respect the root level minimumReleaseAge: 4320 config set in pnpm-workspace.yaml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
Repo: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T16:27:48.109Z
Learning: pnpm version `10.23.0` and Node.js version `20.11.1` are required for development
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (21)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
98-104: Job structure and conditional logic are sound.The job definition correctly targets release PRs (when
published != 'true') and uses appropriate permissions for git operations. The dependency onneeds: releaseensures this runs after the main release job completes. This approach of using a separate job (rather than a step within the release job) is good for isolation—each job gets a fresh workspace as intended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T16:27:48.109Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T16:27:48.109Z
Learning: pnpm version `10.23.0` and Node.js version `20.11.1` are required for development
Applied to files:
.github/workflows/release.yml
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T16:27:48.109Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T16:27:48.109Z
Learning: Use pnpm for package management in this monorepo
Applied to files:
.github/workflows/release.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/release.yml (2)
118-126: Verify Node.js version consistency.The update-lockfile job specifies Node 20.19.0, which differs from the learnings indicating Node 20.11.1 is required for development. Ensure this version upgrade is intentional and compatible with the monorepo.
Was the Node.js version intentionally upgraded from 20.11.1 to 20.19.0? Please confirm this is compatible with the rest of the codebase.
128-142: Error handling improvements look good.The commit and push step now includes
set -efor proper error handling and specifies the branch explicitly in the git push command (git push origin changeset-release/main), addressing the prior review feedback. The conditional check (git diff --quiet) ensures no unnecessary commits are made when the lockfile is unchanged.
41accee to
da5e2ab
Compare
This is a step which we currently need to do manually and it's rather painful. The lockfile update is necessary due to cross references in our packages.
Added it as a separate job instead of a step to start from fresh workspace, as the state that the
changesetstep leaves the workdir is not explicitly clear to the reader.