-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Doc update #365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Doc update #365
Conversation
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
Summary of ChangesHello @sastaachar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request contains a minor documentation update to improve the accuracy of a code example. The change ensures that the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
SonarQube Quality Gate
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly updates a JSDoc example in src/types.ts to use InterceptedApiType.AnswerData instead of the incorrect InterceptedApiType.DATA. While reviewing, I noticed that the same example uses a property enableApiIntercept which is not defined in the SDK's type definitions. This will cause a TypeScript error for developers. I've added a comment to address this documentation issue.
| * ```js | ||
| * const embed = new LiveboardEmbed('#embed', { | ||
| * ...viewConfig, | ||
| * enableApiIntercept: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The property enableApiIntercept used in this example is not defined in LiveboardViewConfig or any of its base types. This will cause a TypeScript error for users who copy this example. Please either add enableApiIntercept?: boolean; to the appropriate type definition (e.g., ApiInterceptFlags) or remove it from the example if it's not a valid property.
commit: |








No description provided.