Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Replace synchronous time.sleep with await asyncio.sleep in mcp_servers_apply#149

Open
thirdeyenation wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-async-sleep-optimization-6427326107714858165
Open

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Replace synchronous time.sleep with await asyncio.sleep in mcp_servers_apply#149
thirdeyenation wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-async-sleep-optimization-6427326107714858165

Conversation

@thirdeyenation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the synchronous time.sleep(1) with the non-blocking await asyncio.sleep(1) within the process method of the McpServersApply API handler. Added the asyncio import at the top of the file.
🎯 Why: The process method is an asynchronous coroutine (async def process(...)). Using the synchronous time.sleep function inside it blocks the entire Python event loop. While the application sleeps for 1 second to wait for configuration reinitialization, it cannot process any other concurrent tasks or API requests, significantly degrading overall concurrency and responsiveness.
📊 Impact: Prevents blocking of the application's event loop during MCP server application. This significantly improves concurrency and responsiveness, as the server can now handle other tasks and requests during this 1-second delay instead of completely freezing.
🔬 Measurement:

  • Ensure that the application correctly applies MCP server configuration without errors.
  • Running load testing with concurrent requests during the MCP server apply process will show that other requests are not blocked and are handled successfully.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6427326107714858165 started by @thirdeyenation

- Replaced time.sleep(1) with await asyncio.sleep(1) in api/mcp_servers_apply.py
- Added missing asyncio import
- This prevents the event loop from blocking while applying MCP server configuration

Co-authored-by: thirdeyenation <133812267+thirdeyenation@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant