Skip to content

Fix compatibility with Protobuf 5+ in dataset_info.py#11179

Open
tomvdw wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/protobuf-5-compatibility-2089587196834168595
Open

Fix compatibility with Protobuf 5+ in dataset_info.py#11179
tomvdw wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/protobuf-5-compatibility-2089587196834168595

Conversation

@tomvdw
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tomvdw tomvdw commented May 6, 2026

Update dataset_info.py to check for is_repeated instead of label to support both older and newer versions of protobuf (5+).


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2089587196834168595 started by @tomvdw

…th protobuf 5+

Protobuf 5+ removes the `label` attribute from the `FieldDescriptor`. This commit updates the `tensorflow_datasets/core/dataset_info.py` to use `is_repeated` when available, falling back to the `label == LABEL_REPEATED` check for older versions.

Co-authored-by: tomvdw <4160552+tomvdw@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant