Skip to content

Conversation

@caio-pizzol
Copy link
Contributor

@caio-pizzol caio-pizzol commented Jan 16, 2026

Original:
image
image

Bug:
image

Fixed:
image

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5233205777

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Collaborator

@harbournick harbournick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@harbournick harbournick merged commit 9b81f9a into main Jan 16, 2026
4 checks passed
@harbournick harbournick deleted the caio/sd-1518-export-comment-range-markers-commentrangestartend-to branch January 16, 2026 18:59
harbournick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2026
# [1.8.0-next.2](v1.8.0-next.1...v1.8.0-next.2) (2026-01-16)

### Bug Fixes

* add addToHistory to new insertTrackedChange command ([#1767](#1767)) ([e5081be](e5081be))
* annotation selection ([#1762](#1762)) ([1c831cc](1c831cc))
* guard against null editor ref in telemetry handler ([#1763](#1763)) ([16b3a9a](16b3a9a))
* preserve nested comment ranges on export (SD-1518) ([#1765](#1765)) ([9b81f9a](9b81f9a))
@harbournick
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.8.0-next.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants