Two-Pointers-1 Done

[ManishaRana1195]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

• Strengths:
  • The student has correctly implemented the two-pointer technique to solve the problem.
  • The code is clean, well-commented, and easy to understand.
  • The solution handles edge cases, such as an array of length 1, appropriately.
• Areas for Improvement:
  • The variable names (blue, red, white) are a bit unconventional. While they are descriptive, using more standard names like low, mid, high (as in the reference solution) might make the code more immediately understandable to others.
  • The comment at the top could be slightly more detailed to explain the logic more thoroughly, especially for someone who is new to the problem.

[super30admin]

• The student's solution is well-implemented and follows the same logic as the reference solution. The use of three pointers (blue, red, white) is a good approach and is correctly implemented.
• The comments are helpful and explain the logic clearly.
• The code is clean and easy to understand. The variable names are descriptive, which makes the code more readable.
• One minor improvement could be to add a check for an empty array at the beginning of the method, similar to the check for a single-element array. This would make the solution more robust.