Completed Two-Pointers-1

[rbhargav0104]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Strengths:

1. Correct implementation of the two-pointer technique.
2. Proper handling of edge cases (e.g., when mid crosses right).
3. Good code organization with a separate swap method.
4. Clear and concise logic.

Areas for Improvement:

1. The swap method could be made inline since it's a simple operation and might benefit from compiler optimizations.
2. Adding a brief comment explaining the overall approach at the top of the method could enhance readability for others.
3. The file name "sortcolours.cpp" has a typo ("colours" instead of "colors"), which should be corrected for consistency.

[super30admin]

Strengths:

• The implementation correctly follows the Dutch National Flag algorithm.
• The code is clean, modular, and easy to understand.
• Variable names are well-chosen (left, mid, right) which makes the logic clear.
• The use of a helper function (swap) is a good practice.

Areas for Improvement:

• The problem title in the submission is "Two-Pointers-1", but the file name is "sortcolours.cpp". It would be better to keep consistent naming conventions.
• The swap function could be made inline for potential performance benefits, though this is a minor optimization.
• The student included an unrelated file (containerwithmostwater.cpp) in the submission, which should be avoided unless it's part of the same problem set.