Skip to content

Done Greedy-2#563

Open
sainathek1999 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
sainathek1999:master
Open

Done Greedy-2#563
sainathek1999 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
sainathek1999:master

Conversation

@sainathek1999
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Schedule Tasks (problem1.java)

Strengths:

  1. Excellent use of the mathematical formula approach - much more efficient than the greedy simulation approach in the reference solution
  2. Clear and well-documented code with detailed comments
  3. Correctly handles the case where multiple tasks share the maximum frequency
  4. Properly handles edge cases (when available slots become negative)
  5. Good explanation of the approach in comments

Areas for Improvement:

  1. The formula available = partitions * (n - (noofmaxfreq - 1)) could be more readable if broken into separate variables
  2. Consider adding a brief comment explaining the mathematical reasoning behind the formula
  3. The variable name l (lowercase L) could be confused with 1 (one) - consider using len or length

VERDICT: PASS


Reconstruct Queue by Height (problem2.java)

Strengths:

  • Excellent documentation with detailed comments explaining the algorithm and time/space complexity
  • Clear explanation of the thought process and how the student fixed initial issues
  • Proper use of Java 8 lambda expressions for sorting
  • Good variable naming convention

Areas for Improvement:

  • The final conversion from ArrayList to 2D array can be simplified to a single line: return li.toArray(new int[0][0]); - this is both cleaner and follows the reference solution's approach
  • Consider adding a brief comment explaining why we sort by height descending (to ensure taller people don't get displaced by shorter ones)

VERDICT: PASS


label partitioning (problem3.java)

Strengths:

  • Excellent documentation with detailed comments explaining the algorithm and complexity
  • Clean, readable code with meaningful variable names
  • Correct algorithm implementation that handles edge cases properly
  • Good understanding of the problem's requirements

Areas for Improvement:

  • Consider using an int[26] array instead of HashMap for slightly better performance, since we know the input consists only of lowercase English letters. This would avoid HashMap overhead.
  • The comment "Did this code successfully run on LeetCode : Yes" is good but could be more specific about test cases passed.

Overall, this is a solid solution that demonstrates good problem-solving skills and coding practices.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants