Skip to content

Conversation

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member

@mulkieran mulkieran self-assigned this Dec 10, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@mulkieran has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60be64c and 51a821d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Cargo.toml (0 hunks)
  • src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@packit-as-a-service
Copy link

Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾

You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:

  • sudo dnf install -y 'dnf*-command(copr)'
  • dnf copr enable packit/stratis-storage-libcryptsetup-rs-458
  • And now you can install the packages.

Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment.

@mulkieran mulkieran moved this to In Review in 2025December Dec 10, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran added this to the 0.14.1 milestone Dec 10, 2025
Generally better to use the library standard facility rather than an
external crate where possible.

LazyLock was introduced in version 1.80.0 of the Rust standard library.

Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
@mulkieran mulkieran changed the title Use std lazy facilities instead of once_cell::Lazy Use std::sync::LazyLock instead of once_cell::Lazy Dec 10, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran merged commit cf7cbeb into stratis-storage:master Dec 10, 2025
74 of 83 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in 2025December Dec 10, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran deleted the issue_project_833 branch December 10, 2025 23:13
@mulkieran mulkieran moved this from Done to Done(1) in 2025December Dec 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done(1)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant