Skip to content

Conversation

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member

@mulkieran mulkieran commented Oct 24, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated build pipeline dependencies to improve CI/CD stability.

Signed-off-by: the Mulhern <amulhern@amulhern.bos.csb>
@mulkieran mulkieran self-assigned this Oct 24, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Walkthrough

A GitHub Actions workflow file receives a single dependency addition—libatomic is added to the python-checks matrix dependencies block to support linting tasks. No functional logic or control flow modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow Configuration
.github/workflows/main.yml
Added libatomic to the dependencies block within the python-checks matrix to fulfill linting requirements.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

The change is minimal and isolated—a single dependency addition to a CI/CD workflow configuration. Review time depends on verifying why libatomic is required for the linting environment.

Poem

🐰 A whisker-twitch of wisdom flows,
Libatomic in the workflow goes,
One small link, the linter's friend,
A CI task that's now on trend!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "Require libatomic for pyright" directly and accurately describes the main change in the pull request. The changeset adds libatomic to the dependencies in the workflow configuration to support pyright linting tasks. The title is concise (4 words), specific enough for a teammate scanning history to understand the primary change, and avoids vague language or unnecessary noise. It clearly conveys both what is being added (libatomic) and the purpose (for pyright).
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 842386f and ed3ab45.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)

20-31: Verify: libatomic should be available for all matrix items if pyright requires it.

The PR adds libatomic to only the first matrix item's dependencies, but the workflow installs pyright for all matrix items at line 57 (pip install --user pyright). If pyright requires libatomic to install or compile (as suggested by the PR title), then libatomic should be available before pyright installation runs for every matrix item, not just the first.

This creates a potential inconsistency: matrix items 2, 3, and 4 may fail to install pyright if they lack libatomic.

Please clarify one of the following:

  1. If pyright is only used in the lint task (first matrix item): Consider making the pip install --user pyright step conditional (only for the lint task), so libatomic only needs to be in the first matrix item.

  2. If pyright is used in all matrix items or if libatomic is a prerequisite for pyright installation for all items: Add libatomic to all matrix items' dependencies, or add it as a base dependency outside the matrix.

  3. If libatomic is not actually required for pyright installation: Remove the dependency or clarify its purpose.

Please verify the intended behavior so the workflow is consistent across all matrix items.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mulkieran mulkieran merged commit 59cbef7 into stratis-storage:master Oct 24, 2025
6 checks passed
@mulkieran mulkieran moved this from Done to Done(3) in 2025October Oct 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done(3)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant