Skip to content

Conversation

@sergisiso
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.95%. Comparing base (470e0f7) to head (3216af8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3258      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.91%   99.95%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         376      376              
  Lines       53522    53485      -37     
==========================================
- Hits        53477    53463      -14     
+ Misses         45       22      -23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sergisiso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@arporter This is ready for review. It brings the codecov misses from 45 to 27 and adds no-cover pragmas to the remaining (maybe you know how to do better in the remaining?). I also added a more strict reporting for deleted lines (indirect changes).

@arporter arporter changed the title (closes #3250) Complete code coverage (closes #3250 #279) Complete code coverage Dec 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@arporter arporter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks very much for tackling this Sergi.
There are a couple of cases where I think we can add tests rather than no-cover pragmas. Also, you've removed some validation code from ACCEnterDataTrans and I don't understand why.

@sergisiso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@arporter This is ready for another look.

Copy link
Member

@arporter arporter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Sergi. Apart from the need to put back (or discuss) the check for different asynch. queues in EnterData, this is pretty much ready to go now. I see the integration tests were all OK previously so won't re-run them now.

@sergisiso sergisiso changed the title (closes #3250 #279) Complete code coverage (closes #279) Remove Arguments.dofs and generally improve code coverage Jan 6, 2026
@sergisiso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I reverted the controversial change and removed #3250 from the list of issues that the PR will close since finally it doesn't reach 100% coverage and I still want to look to the remaining lines at some point.

Ready for another look @arporter

@arporter arporter deployed to integration January 7, 2026 13:19 — with GitHub Actions Active
Copy link
Member

@arporter arporter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All looks good now, thanks Sergi.
As master has now moved on, I'll re-run the IT and then proceed to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants