Skip to content

docs(readme): add claude-wrapper to implementations table#26

Merged
smartwatermelon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/add-claude-wrapper-to-readme-2187
May 1, 2026
Merged

docs(readme): add claude-wrapper to implementations table#26
smartwatermelon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/add-claude-wrapper-to-readme-2187

Conversation

@smartwatermelon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Adds claude-wrapper to the "Where the implementations live" table in README.md.
  • The wrapper is the PATH-shim that shadows the real claude CLI to inject 1Password secrets, GitHub tokens, and remote-control session names. It deploys differently from claude-config (single binary symlinked into ~/.local/bin/ vs. directory tree symlinked into ~/.claude/), so it warrants its own row.

Context

Spotted while discussing whether claude-wrapper and claude-config should be merged. They shouldn't — they have distinct deployment shapes and distinct blast radii — but the spec didn't reflect that the wrapper is a sibling implementation. Now it does.

Notes

Pre-push codebase review surfaced an unrelated pre-existing issue in docs/WORKFLOW-DEEP-DIVE.md:310 (mislabels claude-wrapper as "this repo"), filed as #25 for the burndown tool. Not in scope for this PR.

Test plan

  • markdownlint passes
  • Pre-push adversarial-reviewer + codebase-reviewer PASS

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The implementations table listed every repo in the local-first
infrastructure except claude-wrapper, which is the PATH-shim that
shadows the real `claude` CLI to inject 1Password secrets and remote-
control session names. Adding it for completeness so the architectural
split between binary-deployment (claude-wrapper) and directory-tree-
deployment (claude-config) is documented.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@smartwatermelon smartwatermelon merged commit 332b99c into main May 1, 2026
2 checks passed
@smartwatermelon smartwatermelon deleted the claude/add-claude-wrapper-to-readme-2187 branch May 1, 2026 22:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant