Skip to content

improve bucket width for meta latency#446

Open
augustbleeds wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
augustus.improve-meta-latency-buckets
Open

improve bucket width for meta latency#446
augustbleeds wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
augustus.improve-meta-latency-buckets

Conversation

@augustbleeds
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 23, 2026 18:05
@augustbleeds augustbleeds requested review from a team and dimriou as code owners April 23, 2026 18:05
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 augustbleeds, thanks for creating this pull request!

To help reviewers, please consider creating future PRs as drafts first. This allows you to self-review and make any final changes before notifying the team.

Once you're ready, you can mark it as "Ready for review" to request feedback. Thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 API Diff Results

No changes detected for module github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink-evm

View full report

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adjusts the Meta auction endpoint latency histogram buckets to provide finer-grained resolution in key latency ranges, improving observability for meta_endpoint_latency in the dualbroadcast TXM wrapper.

Changes:

  • Expanded and refined explicit histogram bucket boundaries for meta_endpoint_latency (more buckets around ~5s and ~10s).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +43 to +46
500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000,
4250, 4500, 4750, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5250, 5500, 5750, 6000,
6500, 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500, 9000, 9250, 9500, 9750, 9900,
10000, 10100, 10250, 10500, 11000, 12000, 15000,
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants