refactor(experiment): separate huh and lipgloss changes of charm

[zimeg]

Changelog

N/A - Though changes to the experiments page are included! 🧪 ✨

Summary

This PR separates the huh and lipgloss changes of charm experiment into separate experiments to keep changes of prompts and style ordered toward stable release 🎁

Preview

Before changes:

$ slack create -e charm

After changes:

$ slack create -e huh -e lipgloss

Requirements

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 58.20896% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 68.23%. Comparing base (8056444) to head (48b912d).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
internal/iostreams/charm.go	60.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
internal/style/template.go	0.00%	7 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/iostreams/prompts.go	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
internal/style/style.go	90.90%	2 Missing ⚠️
cmd/help/help.go	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
cmd/project/create_samples.go	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
internal/iostreams/printer.go	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #411      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.24%   68.23%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         218      218              
  Lines       18049    18054       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        12318    12319       +1     
- Misses       4578     4581       +3     
- Partials     1153     1154       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mwbrooks]

✅ Thank you so much for breaking these out! Confidence toward a huh release is feeling higher, scope is smaller, and focus is stronger 💪🏻 I imagine this was a tedious task, but I appreciate it! 🙇🏻

❓ Left a non-blocking question - just something to think about but not take action on right now.

[mwbrooks]

👌🏻

[mwbrooks]

question: Long-term, is there a more appropriate filename than charm.go? As a new maintainer I may not connect that two packages - huh and lipgloss - are from the same group charm. I see the newForm constructor uses both, but I wonder if we have an opportunity for a huh.go instead?

[zimeg]

@mwbrooks I share this feeling. The terms "charm" or "huh" or "lipgloss" are meaningful for package imports but we might want to refactor this into a different packages once experiments conclude:

• internal/iostreams/charm.go -> internal/iostreams/forms.go

I'm not against huh.go either but it takes me a second to realize it's asking for input the same 😉