Skip to content

chore: improve testing around assistant utilities#1461

Open
WilliamBergamin wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
imporve-assistant-behavior-test-coverage
Open

chore: improve testing around assistant utilities#1461
WilliamBergamin wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
imporve-assistant-behavior-test-coverage

Conversation

@WilliamBergamin
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

These changes aim to improve the coverage of tests around the assistant utilities

Testing

CI should be sufficient

Category

  • slack_bolt.App and/or its core components
  • slack_bolt.async_app.AsyncApp and/or its core components
  • Adapters in slack_bolt.adapter
  • Document pages under /docs
  • Others

Requirements

Please read the Contributing guidelines and Code of Conduct before creating this issue or pull request. By submitting, you are agreeing to those rules.

  • I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
  • I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.
  • I've run ./scripts/install_all_and_run_tests.sh after making the changes.

@WilliamBergamin WilliamBergamin added this to the 1.27.1 milestone Mar 16, 2026
@WilliamBergamin WilliamBergamin self-assigned this Mar 16, 2026
@WilliamBergamin WilliamBergamin requested a review from a team as a code owner March 16, 2026 22:40
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.89%. Comparing base (898e0b8) to head (5a75303).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1461      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.67%   90.89%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         226      226              
  Lines        7205     7205              
==========================================
+ Hits         6533     6549      +16     
+ Misses        672      656      -16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@zimeg zimeg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@WilliamBergamin LGTM! These are nice tests to build confidence in current implementation 🧪 ✨

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants