Skip to content

Conversation

@eseiler
Copy link
Member

@eseiler eseiler commented Jul 8, 2025

No description provided.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added the lint [INTERNAL] used for linting label Jul 8, 2025
@seqan-actions seqan-actions removed the lint [INTERNAL] used for linting label Jul 8, 2025
@seqan-actions
Copy link
Member

Documentation preview available at https://docs.seqan.de/preview/seqan/hibf/293

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.73%. Comparing base (36c2235) to head (0179f6d).
⚠️ Report is 30 commits behind head on main.

⚠️ Current head 0179f6d differs from pull request most recent head 95b7b93

Please upload reports for the commit 95b7b93 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #293   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.73%   99.73%           
=======================================
  Files          52       53    +1     
  Lines        1881     1888    +7     
  Branches        2        2           
=======================================
+ Hits         1876     1883    +7     
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] used for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] used for linting labels Jul 14, 2025
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] used for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] used for linting labels Jul 18, 2025
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added the lint [INTERNAL] used for linting label Jan 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lint [INTERNAL] used for linting

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants