Account for unbonding balances when calculating withdrawn rewards #24
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
philipsu522
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
| mock_env().contract.address.clone(), | ||
| vec![Coin::new(48000000 - 1500000 + 100, "usei")], | ||
| ); | ||
| // principal: 48000000 - 1500000 (delegations). |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do we have tests for cases where there are no unbonding delegations?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes and provide context
Rewards that are withdrawn automatically because of undelegate/redelegate should be calculated as:
Previously there was no way to query unbonding principals from a CW contract so we have been under-withdrawing. This PR fixes that.
Testing performed to validate your change
unit test
integration test with sei-chain (which now supports unbonding balance query)