Skip to content

Conversation

@lucascolley
Copy link
Contributor

closes gh-26

preview = ["pixi-build"]

[tool.pixi.package]
name = "spatch"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this line can probably be removed following the release of prefix-dev/pixi-build-backends#308

Copy link
Contributor

@seberg seberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, will probably just put it in a bit.

One question is whether we should add a CI job just for the sake of it, right now there isn't a lot that might break.

@seberg
Copy link
Contributor

seberg commented Aug 26, 2025

Let me just put it in, we can always change a test run in some future, thanks Lucas!

@seberg seberg merged commit 6db573a into scientific-python:main Aug 26, 2025
10 checks passed
@lucascolley
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks! If you merge main in gh-25 we can try depending on the Pixi package in SciPy CI

@seberg
Copy link
Contributor

seberg commented Aug 26, 2025

Yeah, let me just do that, it's a trivial change (although a test would be neat).

@lucascolley lucascolley deleted the pixi branch August 26, 2025 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

packaging: make spatch a Pixi package

2 participants