Skip to content

Conversation

@tlambert03
Copy link
Member

fixes #223

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.09677% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.24%. Comparing base (6f54078) to head (3427cb5).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/ndv/controllers/_array_viewer.py 80.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #225      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.33%   85.24%   -1.09%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        5209     5239      +30     
==========================================
- Hits         4497     4466      -31     
- Misses        712      773      +61     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@gselzer gselzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, thanks! Was gonna make this change myself but a few things got in the way

self.lut_views: list[LutView] = []
self.lut_model = lut_model
self.lut_model.events.clims.connect(self._auto_scale)
self.lut_model.events.name.connect(self._on_name_changed)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For parity with other LUTModel fields, could we connect this signal in LutView.model?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature request: Public API for setting channel names/labels

2 participants