chore: add typings for xscode eval

[nirav0999]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @nirav0999, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've implemented and refined the evaluation logic for xscode, specifically focusing on how the system handles refusals and identifies security vulnerabilities. This update ensures more robust error handling and clearer reporting of evaluation results, improving the overall reliability and readability of the evaluation process.

Highlights

• Type Hinting Refinement: Updated function signatures to use more precise type hints, specifically changing a return type from "List" to "Dict" for "check_xscode_prompt" and adding a "List[str]" return type for "evaluate_xscode_refusal".
• Error Handling Improvement: Modified the "evaluate_xscode_refusal" function to raise a "ValueError" when no intermediate results are found, providing a more explicit error state.
• Enhanced Output: Improved the console output for the acceptance rate by utilizing "rich.print" to display the message in green, making it more visually distinct.
• Clarity in Variable Naming: Renamed "analyzer_data" to "vuln_results" within "evaluate_xscode_answers" to better reflect its content, enhancing code readability.
• Refined Vulnerability ID Extraction: Adjusted the logic for extracting "vuln_task_ids" to directly use the keys from the "vuln_results" dictionary.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the xscode evaluation module to improve code clarity and error handling. The changes focus on standardizing return types, improving error handling patterns, and enhancing code readability.

Key changes:

• Updated function return type annotations for better type safety
• Replaced print statements with rich formatting for better output presentation
• Changed error handling from early return to explicit exception raising

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request improves the xscode_overrefuse.py evaluation script by adding and correcting type hints, improving error handling by raising a ValueError for empty results, and enhancing code clarity with variable renames and more concise list creation. My review includes suggestions to further improve code quality by adding a missing type hint, removing a redundant print statement, and using a more idiomatic way to create a list from dictionary keys.