This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 4, 2020. It is now read-only.
Open
Conversation
Straightforward combo of `unionWith` and `unions`. Haskell's `container` has it.
Contributor
|
👍, see #55. I think this should at least have a few tests, though. In particular I think there are at least a couple of different sensible implementations of this function, based on which direction we fold or which direction we apply the given combining function in; a test should ideally prevent us from accidentally switching between two of these in a future release without noticing. |
Author
|
@hdgarrood Added a couple test mirroring those for |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Straightforward combo of
unionWithandunions. Haskell'scontainershas it.