Fix storybook build command for v10 compatibility#2967
Draft
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intodependabot/npm_and_yarn/docs/multi-5feea22bbcfrom
Draft
Fix storybook build command for v10 compatibility#2967Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intodependabot/npm_and_yarn/docs/multi-5feea22bbcfrom
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intodependabot/npm_and_yarn/docs/multi-5feea22bbcfrom
Conversation
|
Co-authored-by: TylerJDev <26746305+TylerJDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix the failing GitHub Actions workflow Deploy preview
Fix storybook build command for v10 compatibility
Jan 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What are you trying to accomplish?
The "Deploy preview / Build" workflow fails with
error: too many arguments for 'build'. Expected 0 arguments but got 1.Storybook v10 changed the
buildcommand to not accept positional arguments. The build script was passingpublic/staticas a positional arg after-o public/storybook, which is invalid syntax.What approach did you choose and why?
Removed the
public/staticpositional argument fromdocs/script/build-storybook:Static files are already copied via
staticDirs: ['../stories/static']in.storybook/main.js- the extra argument was redundant and now breaks with v10.What should reviewers focus on?
Verify the workflow passes and static files are served correctly in the deployed preview.
Can these changes ship as is?
Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.