Skip to content

Conversation

@wolfv
Copy link
Member

@wolfv wolfv commented Jan 13, 2026

cc @woodruffw / @jku - would love a review on this PR :)

@jku
Copy link

jku commented Jan 13, 2026

hey, sorry I promised too much last week WRT this (I'm a little swamped right now): I have branch as well but I just haven't had time to test it yet so not sure if it's usable. I'll make the branch available as well in case you'd like to see -- I removed ambient.rs completely in my version: I think that makes sense.

But obviously don't feel like you need to use that branch.

@jku jku mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
@woodruffw
Copy link

Thanks for the ping @wolfv, I'll do a review today!

Copy link

@woodruffw woodruffw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

(I see this drops support for some machine identity platforms that ambient-id doesn't support yet -- I'd be happy to collaborate on adding support for those upstream!)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants