Skip to content

chore: update compatible dependencies#318

Open
poe-code-agent[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/update-compatible-dependencies-20260518
Open

chore: update compatible dependencies#318
poe-code-agent[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/update-compatible-dependencies-20260518

Conversation

@poe-code-agent
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Updated npm lockfile dependencies to latest compatible versions.
  • Refreshed generated harness schema formatting.
  • Updated affected tests for dependency/runtime output changes.

Validation

  • npm run build
  • npm run lint
  • npx turbo run test:unit --concurrency=4 --force
  • npx vitest run scripts/postinstall-sync-skills.test.ts

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@poe-code-agent poe-code-agent Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requested changes: dependency update narrows supported Node 20 range.

Comment thread package-lock.json
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=20"
"node": ">=20.18.1"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This update selects e2b@2.20.1, which now requires Node >=20.18.1, while the repo/package still advertises engines.node: >=20. Because e2b is a production dependency, installs with engine-strict on Node 20.0-20.17 now fail despite being in the supported range. Please either raise the advertised Node engine to >=20.18.1 or keep e2b on a compatible 2.19.x version.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 34a37498f7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread package-lock.json
Comment on lines 4807 to 4809
"engines": {
"node": ">=20"
"node": ">=20.18.1"
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Align locked e2b version with declared Node support

This update locks e2b to a release that requires Node >=20.18.1, which narrows runtime compatibility compared with the project’s declared engines.node: >=20 range. In environments that enforce engines (for example npm ci with engine-strict=true), installs on Node 20.0–20.17 will now fail even though those versions are still advertised as supported; either pin e2b to a compatible version or raise the project’s minimum Node version to match.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread package-lock.json
Comment on lines +251 to 253
"engines": {
"node": ">= 20.12.0"
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Align @clack/prompts lock with declared Node support

The lockfile now resolves @clack/prompts to a version that declares node >=20.12.0, but the project still advertises engines.node: >=20. Because this is a direct runtime dependency of the CLI, installs on Node 20.0–20.11 can fail under engine enforcement (or run with unsupported runtime semantics) despite being documented as supported; pinning to a compatible prompt version or increasing the project’s Node floor avoids that mismatch.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants