stability-test-next-gen - 2026-02-28 06:01:40

[hongyunyan]

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• Chores
  • Minor formatting adjustment to build configuration.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes or new features.

[hongyunyan]

/test next-gen

[ti-chi-bot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign 3aceshowhand for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, identified as an automated stability test, introduces a minor change by adding a single empty line to the Makefile. The primary purpose appears to be to trigger or facilitate an automated process, likely related to stability testing, with minimal functional impact on the project's build system.

Highlights

• Makefile Modification: An empty line was appended to the end of the Makefile.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• Makefile
  • Added an empty line at the end of the file.

Activity

• No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a newline character at the end of the Makefile. This is a minor, stylistic change that is generally considered good practice and has no functional impact. My review did not identify any issues with this modification.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8e6236 and 39dd79b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Makefile

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A trailing newline is added to the Makefile after the generate-next-gen-grafana target. This is a purely cosmetic formatting adjustment with no impact on Makefile functionality or behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Makefile Formatting Makefile	Added trailing newline after the generate-next-gen-grafana target for consistent formatting.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Suggested labels

release-note-none

Poem

🐰 A newline hops in with grace,
At the end of a make-file place,
Where generate declares its way,
Formatting rules save the day! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title 'stability-test-next-gen - 2026-02-28 06:01:40' is a timestamp-based automated test label that does not describe the actual change (adding a trailing newline to Makefile).	Replace with a descriptive title that summarizes the actual change, such as 'Add trailing newline to Makefile' or 'Format Makefile with trailing newline'.
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description is minimal and missing critical sections required by the template, including issue number, detailed explanation of changes, test information, and release notes.	Complete the description using the repository template: add issue number, explain what changed and why, specify test type, answer compatibility questions, and include appropriate release notes.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[ti-chi-bot]

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}

[ti-chi-bot]

@hongyunyan: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cdc-pulsar-integration-light-next-gen	39dd79b	link	false	/test pull-cdc-pulsar-integration-light-next-gen

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.