stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-02-28 02:00:33

[hongyunyan]

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Minor formatting update to internal build configuration.

No user-facing changes in this release.

[ti-chi-bot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lidezhu for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-heavy

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-light

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-light

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-heavy

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request serves as an automated stability test, designed to validate the system's resilience for non-next-gen configurations. The change itself is minimal, involving the addition of a single empty line to the Makefile, which acts as a trigger for the automated testing process without introducing any functional modifications to the codebase.

Highlights

• Automated Stability Test: This pull request is part of an automated stability test, specifically for non-next-gen systems, initiated on 2026-02-28.
• Makefile Modification: An empty line was added to the Makefile to trigger this automated test.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• Makefile
  • Added an empty line at the end of the file.

Activity

• This pull request was automatically generated by the user 'hongyunyan' as part of a stability testing routine.
• The PR title indicates it's a 'stability-test-non-next-gen' initiated on '2026-02-28 02:00:33'.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8e6236 and 0c83c46.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Makefile

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A trailing blank line was added to the Makefile after the generate-next-gen-grafana target. No functional or control flow changes were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Makefile Formatting Makefile	Added trailing blank line after generate-next-gen-grafana target.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Suggested labels

size/XS

Suggested reviewers

• wk989898
• lidezhu

Poem

A little line, so small and true,
A rabbit's touch of whitespace new,
The Makefile breathes with space to spare,
A tidy touch beyond compare! 🐰

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title appears to be an automated timestamp-based identifier rather than a meaningful description of the actual change (adding a blank line to Makefile).	Replace the title with a clear, descriptive summary of the change, such as 'Add blank line to Makefile for formatting' or similar.
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is minimal and does not follow the required template structure. It lacks Issue Number, detailed explanation of the problem, and required sections like Testing and Release Notes.	Fill out the PR description template with Issue Number linking, detailed problem statement, testing information, and appropriate release note section.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a newline character at the end of the Makefile. Based on the title and description, this appears to be an automated change for stability testing. The change is benign and aligns with standard file formatting practices. I have reviewed the modification and found no issues.

[ti-chi-bot]

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}