stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-02-28 00:00:07

[hongyunyan]

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Minor formatting adjustment with no functional impact.

[ti-chi-bot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign wlwilliamx for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-heavy

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-light

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-light

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-heavy

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request serves as an automated stability test, introducing a minimal, non-functional change to the Makefile. The primary purpose is to trigger and validate the continuous integration pipeline's stability testing mechanisms, ensuring they function as expected without altering core functionality.

Highlights

• Automated Stability Test: An empty line was added to the Makefile to facilitate an automated stability test, as indicated by the PR description.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• Makefile
  • Added an empty line at the end of the file.

Activity

• No human activity recorded for this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[hongyunyan]

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8e6236 and 5d3fc95.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Makefile

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A trailing blank line was added to the Makefile after the "generate-next-gen-grafana" target. This is a formatting adjustment with no functional impact on build targets, dependencies, or command execution.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Makefile formatting Makefile	Added trailing blank line after the "generate-next-gen-grafana" target for improved formatting consistency.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Suggested labels

size/XS

Suggested reviewers

• wk989898
• lidezhu

Poem

A newline here, a newline there,
The Makefile breathes with whitespace care,
No logic changed, no targets bent,
Just formatting's gentle indent! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title is not a meaningful description of the changeset; it appears to be a timestamp-based automation identifier rather than a summary of the actual change (adding a blank line to Makefile).	Replace the title with a clear, concise description of the main change, such as 'Add trailing blank line to Makefile' or 'Fix Makefile formatting'.
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is incomplete and does not follow the required template; it lacks an Issue Number section, What is changed details, tests checklist, and other required sections from the template.	Complete the description using the repository template, including Issue Number linking, detailed explanation of changes, test information, and release notes sections.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a blank line to the end of the Makefile. As per the description, this is an automated change for stability testing. My review of this change did not identify any issues.

[ti-chi-bot]

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}