Skip to content

feat(skill/feature): add Phase 0.0 issue claim-on-start#4117

Merged
PierreBrisorgueil merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feat/feature-skill-claim-on-start
May 10, 2026
Merged

feat(skill/feature): add Phase 0.0 issue claim-on-start#4117
PierreBrisorgueil merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feat/feature-skill-claim-on-start

Conversation

@PierreBrisorgueil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Add Phase 0.0 — Issue Claim section to /feature skill: when invoked with #N, auto-claims issue via assignee + timestamped WIP — comment
  • Detection table catches cross-session collisions (other assignee, fresh WIP comment <24h, stale WIP >24h)
  • Byte-identical mirror of pierreb-devkit/Node#3639 (already merged)

Test plan

  • Smoke test on sandbox issue (pierreb-projects/infra#29, closed) — verified claim happens, resume path matches @me short-circuit
  • Pre-push critical-review gate: /critical-review Claude backend → OK (0 findings, 97% confidence)
  • Byte-identity vs Node version: zero diff confirmed

Refs pierreb-projects/infra#28
Mirror of pierreb-devkit/Node#3639

Mirror of pierreb-devkit/Node patch — byte-identical Phase 0.0 block.
Detects cross-session agent collisions via assignee + WIP comment
when /feature is invoked with #N. Includes detection-table fix
(@me self-resume short-circuits first), gh issue view failure
handling, uuidgen for session ID entropy.

Refs pierreb-projects/infra#28
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 10, 2026 11:16
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 10, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@PierreBrisorgueil has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 54 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3a4b1d40-24fc-44a9-a049-915eb4e62471

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f8b539 and b15a369.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .claude/skills/feature/SKILL.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/feature-skill-claim-on-start

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@PierreBrisorgueil PierreBrisorgueil merged commit a582430 into master May 10, 2026
4 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds an “Issue Claim” preflight phase to the /feature Claude skill so that invoking /feature #N automatically establishes ownership (assignee + timestamped WIP — … comment) and detects cross-session collisions before proceeding into normal Phase 0 scope analysis.

Changes:

  • Added Phase 0.0 “Issue Claim” flow that runs only when /feature is invoked with an issue number (#N).
  • Defined collision-detection rules based on current assignee and most recent canonical WIP — comment (including <24h vs >24h handling).
  • Standardized the claim action to (1) assign @me and (2) post a structured WIP comment including session id, branch name, and UTC timestamp.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants