Improve date format documentation a little bit #5184
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Make it a bit more visible yet that DATE_ISO8601 is not compatible with ISO-8601 (anyone wondering “why ‘like’?” will hopefully see the note immediately below), and mention the standards that Atom is compatible with (straight from RFC 4287, section 3.3; I omitted the “Date and Time Formats” W3C note as it doesn’t seem as prominent as the others) in the hope of encouraging more people to use it.
lucaswerkmeister
force-pushed
the
iso8601
branch
from
1613afd to
4cb534a
Compare
lucaswerkmeister
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make it a bit more visible yet that
DATE_ISO8601is not compatible with ISO-8601 (anyone wondering “why ‘like’?” will hopefully see the note immediately below), and mention the standards that Atom is compatible with (straight from RFC 4287, section 3.3; I omitted the “Date and Time Formats” W3C note as it doesn’t seem as prominent as the others) in the hope of encouraging more people to use it.