gpioioctl: Correct gpioioctl to implement gpio.Group

[gsexton]

This pull requests changes the LineSet from gpioioctl to implement gpio.Group. It pretty much had the requirements but some of the types were subtly different.

[maruel]

Do I understand we need to roll conn first?

[gsexton]

Do I understand we need to roll conn first?

I've updated go.mod to reference the current version of conn.

Separately, I'll need to update devices to use this new version of host to for the hd44780 work go to in. I know this can be done by referencing commits. Is your preference to do a release, or to have the go.mod reference the commit ID we need?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.2%. Comparing base (28c0c75) to head (6be3152).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
gpioioctl/lineset.go	0.0%	19 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (0.0%) is below the target coverage (60.0%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (27.2%) is below the target coverage (60.0%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main     #67     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   27.2%   27.2%   -0.0%     
=======================================
  Files         96      96             
  Lines      11822   11827      +5     
=======================================
  Hits        3220    3220             
- Misses      8467    8472      +5     
  Partials     135     135             

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[maruel]

Thanks!

[maruel]

That would be better as an example.

[gsexton]

Just to confirm, you're recommending duplicating the example on ByName() to the doc for ByOffset()?

[maruel]

I was thinking about creating a toy example in example_test.go but it was really just a nit, don't bother.

[maruel]

Feel free to patch .codecov.yml to lower the minimum coverage required.

[maruel]

.. or bypass the check