Skip to content

Conversation

@lu-yg
Copy link
Collaborator

@lu-yg lu-yg commented Jan 26, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Checkstyle
    • Specified JDK distribution as "temurin"
    • Minor formatting adjustments to Checkstyle report upload configuration

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Checkstyle, specifically updating the JDK setup to explicitly use the "temurin" distribution. The change involves a minor configuration adjustment in the .github/workflows/checkstyle.yml file, with no substantial alterations to the workflow's core functionality or error handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/checkstyle.yml Added explicit JDK distribution "temurin" and reformatted the Checkstyle report upload line

Poem

🐰 A Checkstyle Hop of Joy

With temurin's embrace so bright,
Our workflow leaps with pure delight!
A tiny tweak, a gentle change,
Code quality now in our range
Rabbit-approved, our pipeline sings! 🛠️


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/checkstyle.yml (2)

46-46: Consider adding error handling for the report upload.

The current configuration assumes the report will always be generated at the specified path. Consider adding error handling to make the workflow more robust.

      - name: Upload Checkstyle report
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+       if: always()  # Upload even if previous steps failed
        with:
          name: checkstyle-report
          path: target/checkstyle-result.xml # 如果是 Maven 项目
+         if-no-files-found: warn  # Warn instead of failing if report isn't generated

Line range hint 1-46: Consider enhancing workflow robustness.

A few suggestions to improve the workflow:

  1. Add timeout limits to prevent long-running jobs
  2. Consider using a stable Ubuntu version (22.04 LTS) instead of 24.04
  3. Remove commented-out Gradle alternatives if not needed
name: Checkstyle Code Quality

on:
  push:
    branches:
      - develop
  pull_request:
    branches:
      - develop

jobs:
  check:
-   runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
+   runs-on: ubuntu-22.04
+   timeout-minutes: 10

    steps:
      - name: Checkout code
        uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Set up JDK 8.*
        uses: actions/setup-java@v4
        with:
          java-version: '8.*'
          distribution: temurin

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: |
-         ./mvnw install # 如果是 Maven 项目
-         # 或者
-         # ./gradlew build # 如果是 Gradle 项目
+         ./mvnw install

      - name: Run Checkstyle
        run: |
-         ./mvnw checkstyle:check # 如果是 Maven 项目
-         # 或者
-         # ./gradlew check # 如果是 Gradle 项目
+         ./mvnw checkstyle:check

      - name: Upload Checkstyle report
        if: always()
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: checkstyle-report
          path: target/checkstyle-result.xml
          if-no-files-found: warn
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1443ec3 and 287aea4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/checkstyle.yml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/checkstyle.yml (1)

25-25: LGTM! Good practice using explicit JDK distribution.

Using the "temurin" distribution is the recommended approach for GitHub Actions as it provides better stability and support.

@lu-yg lu-yg closed this Jan 26, 2025
@lu-yg lu-yg deleted the lu-yg-patch-1 branch February 5, 2025 02:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants