Skip to content

Conversation

@stuggi
Copy link
Contributor

@stuggi stuggi commented Nov 25, 2025

Re-adds support for configuring the webhook server port through the --webhook-bind-address command-line flag (default: 9443).

This flag was previously removed and needs to be restored to support local development and testing scenarios.

Re-adds support for configuring the webhook server port through the
--webhook-bind-address command-line flag (default: 9443).

This flag was previously removed and needs to be restored to support
local development and testing scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <mschuppert@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from fultonj and viroel November 25, 2025 10:08
@stuggi stuggi requested review from dprince and removed request for fultonj and viroel November 25, 2025 10:08
@stuggi stuggi requested a review from abays November 25, 2025 10:08
Copy link
Contributor

@abays abays left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abays, stuggi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@abays
Copy link
Contributor

abays commented Nov 25, 2025

/test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

@stuggi
Copy link
Contributor Author

stuggi commented Nov 26, 2025

hit current know issue with OCP 4.16.53 and metallb speaker pods not starting

pod/speaker-k9w8f                                          0/6     Init:0/3   0          21m
pod/speaker-tgccn                                          0/6     Init:0/3   0          21m
pod/speaker-x5b74                                          0/6     Init:0/3   0          21m

@stuggi
Copy link
Contributor Author

stuggi commented Nov 26, 2025

/override ci/prow/openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 26, 2025

@stuggi: Overrode contexts on behalf of stuggi: ci/prow/openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit ab6ae95 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Nov 26, 2025
8 checks passed
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 26, 2025

@stuggi: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl da555b1 link unknown /test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants