Skip to content

NO-JIRA: ote: fix duplicated topology label on SingleReplica#30759

Open
mtulio wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
mtulio:fix-ote-sno-label
Open

NO-JIRA: ote: fix duplicated topology label on SingleReplica#30759
mtulio wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
mtulio:fix-ote-sno-label

Conversation

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor

@mtulio mtulio commented Feb 4, 2026

Previously the SingleReplica job was setting duplicated topology label:

topology="[SingleReplica SingleReplica]"

https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2018312069375332352/artifacts/e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/single-node-e2e-test/build-log.txt

This fix skips re-adding the label when running in a SingleReplica cluster.

Issue observed while investigating:
#30747
https://issues.redhat.com//browse/TRT-2536

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mtulio: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Previously the SingleReplica job was setting duplicated topology label:

topology="[SingleReplica SingleReplica]"

https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2018312069375332352/artifacts/e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/single-node-e2e-test/build-log.txt

This fix skips re-adding the label when running in a SingleReplica cluster.

Issue observed while investigating:
#30747
https://issues.redhat.com//browse/TRT-2536

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 4, 2026

/assign @neisw

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 4, 2026

/test ?

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 4, 2026

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/b3a6b9a0-020b-11f1-9626-7a5ec4ffd2f3-0

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Feb 4, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mtulio, neisw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2026
@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 6, 2026

I can see the topology="[SingleReplica]" (no duplicated entry) in the microshift job.

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 6, 2026

/verified by @mtulio #30759 (comment)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mtulio: This PR has been marked as verified by @mtulio https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/30759#issuecomment-3860847683.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @mtulio #30759 (comment)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@mtulio: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift 2926066 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2 2926066 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 2926066 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: 2926066

Job Name New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn High - "[Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][Jira:"Test Framework"] operator service account vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator should not create excessive watch requests" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn High - "[Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][Jira:"Test Framework"] operator service account vsphere-problem-detector-operator should not create excessive watch requests" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi High - "[Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][Jira:"Test Framework"] operator service account vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator should not create excessive watch requests" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi High - "[Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][Jira:"Test Framework"] operator service account vsphere-problem-detector-operator should not create excessive watch requests" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 2926066

  • "[Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][Jira:"Test Framework"] operator service account vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator should not create excessive watch requests" [Total: 4, Pass: 4, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "[Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][Jira:"Test Framework"] operator service account vsphere-problem-detector-operator should not create excessive watch requests" [Total: 4, Pass: 4, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants